Foucault on authorship

Is an author merely a name. Foucault might have added another function: Search for Shakespeare in that glorious poetry of the plays and you will find him There is no art except for others. We would read the grocery list we talked about last week differently if we knew it was written by T.

Is an author only a "linkage" from the text to a name. The author becomes an identity, the performance of a role for that taciturn and shy person sitting at his computer keyboard constructing a narrative by which to transcend his or her physical and other limitations. Is an author merely a name.

The following essay was subjected to numerous attacks when I first posted it at MSN and blogger: What about The Decameron. Critics questioned this association, asking Foucault how he could put two authors who were so different, in time and place, together in one grouping.

In short, it is a matter of depriving the subject or its substitute of its role as originator, and of analyzing the subject as a variable and complex function of discourse.

Artists and authorship: the case of Raphael

On b, Foucault takes up the question of "author" as product of "work" again, asking how "the name of the author" serves a function within literary-social relations. Is it really he and not someone else.

Michel Foucault: “What is an Author?”

Think of the author as a magician who pulls not a rabbit, but him- or herself out of a hat, as part of the set of "tricks" presented to an audience. Kierkegaard is not usually regarded as a literary author, but as a writer of non-fiction, a philosopher, so that his texts are found in the philosophy section of the bookstore.

The "author function" is not a universal or constant feature of every text. Writing has become linked to sacrifice, even to the sacrifice of life: Marx, Freud, or the authors of the American Constitution are, accordingly, "authors" of an entire mode of discourse, in which there is a recurring pattern of return to an original sacred or revered text or texts for re-authorization of the interpretive and constructive license to add or contribute to that tradition.

An appeal to Derrida's work is useful. Thus, in creating "Melville" as an author function, it is important to his status as "author" that he actually did go on a whaling voyage; it is irrelevant to his status as author that he worked in a bowling alley in Hawaii although both are historically true.

July 20, at Moreover, the text is also made better by good readers. Don't worry about this part.

What is an Author

What function does the author's name perform in a text, besides that of identification. Is an author only a "linkage" from the text to a name.

Review the full course description and key learning outcomes and create an account and enrol if you want a free statement of participation. Or The Cantebury Tales. Even after the arrival of writing there was little worry about attribution or identification of the teller of the tale.

Michel Foucault: “What is an Author?”

In the humanist view, remember, authors were the source and origin of texts and perhaps of language itself, like Derrida's engineerand were also thus beyond texts--hence authors were "centers. Yet the living person inspiring those passions is now long gone.

One such notion is the idea of the "work. Eliot, would it count as one of his "works"?. Subject: Image Created Date: 5/17/ PM. The Differences between Barthes and Foucault on Authorship Monica Lancini, EnglishThe basic difference between Barthes' essay and Foucault's one is the general perspective on the subject of authorship, which doesn't prevent them from coming to similar conclusions.

Another great introductory essay, Foucault's "What Is an Author?" won't just tell you what Foucault thinks authors' names are good for; it'll also give you a good sense of how he thinks discourse works.

And since this essay is a direct response to Barthes's "The Death of the Author" (), you'll. Foucault’s essay “What is an Author?” might be seen as an example of (post)structuralism, if not of the post-human. Foucault is not interested in the author as a person.

What does Foucault mean by

That view of the. The Differences between Barthes and Foucault on Authorship Monica Lancini, EnglishThe basic difference between Barthes' essay and Foucault's one is the general perspective on the subject of authorship, which doesn't prevent them from coming to similar conclusions.

In his text What is an Author, Foucault makes several arguments as to what characteristics are needed to establish an individual as an author.

Office Hours

An ordinary “discourse” given from one individual to another does not constitute authorship. The main point reiterated throughout the text is the idea of.

Foucault on authorship
Rated 0/5 based on 83 review
Foucault’s emphasis on the “author function” – FYWS: Community & Collaboration